The 'worst case' question is always asked wrong
I keep seeing folks in here treat worst case scenarios like they're some distant hypothetical, but last month at my kid's soccer game I watched a dad lose $200 because he didn't read the fine print on a rental agreement for a party tent. The wind caught it, it ripped, and he was on the hook. It's not about being paranoid, it's about asking 'what's the most likely thing to go wrong' and checking if you can handle that, not the wild disaster version. Has anyone else noticed people skip the boring, probable risks for the exciting, unlikely ones?