My dad spent 30 years at Wells Fargo and told me to go with a broker, I still think he's wrong
He worked at a branch in Omaha for 30 years and retired in 2019. Over dinner he said point blank that banks just sell you the fund with the best kickback, so use a broker who charges a flat fee instead. I get the logic but I keep going back to the 0.25% my credit union charges versus the $2,100 a year the local advisor quoted me. For my $40k in savings, that fee gap eats any edge a broker gives me. Anyone actually run the math on when a flat fee stops making sense for smaller accounts?